×

This is a sample popup content.

  • Cat-intel
  • MedIntelliX
  • Resources
  • About Us
  • Next Generation Sequencing Based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests Regulatory Landscape

    ID: MRFR/50
    200 Pages
    MRFR Team
    May 2025
    $ 4950
    $ 5950
    $ 7950

    Epidemiology Study - Overview

    Overview for Epidemiology Study (based on available reports).

    Helicobacter Pylori Infection Study Objective: To determine the prevalence and incidence of Helicobacter Pylori Infection among individuals in a defined population. This objective outlines the primary aim of the study, which is to establish the frequency of Helicobacter Pylori Infection within a specific age group and geographic area, while also seeking to understand potential factors contributing to its development. Moreover, the report is having geographic coverage including North America, Europe and rest of the world however customisation can be made in the geographic coverage. Helicobacter Pylori Infection Study USP: This epidemiological study on Helicobacter Pylori Infection stands out due to its comprehensive approach in establishing precise prevalence rates, identifying novel risk factors, and exploring geographical variations in a diverse population. By integrating advanced imaging techniques with robust statistical analyses, the study aims to provide actionable insights to identify treatment opportunities, target population, and an overview on public health initiatives aimed at mitigating the impact of Helicobacter Pylori Infection related health problems. Through meticulous data collection and rigorous methodology, the study not only contributes to the scientific understanding of Helicobacter Pylori Infection but also serves as a foundation for future research events and healthcare policymaking in addressing this increasing Helicobacter Pylori Infection cases. Helicobacter Pylori Infection related Study Overview: The study Defines Helicobacter Pylori Infection as an advanced form of disease. The significance of studying Helicobacter Pylori Infection epidemiology is due to its increasing prevalence in different age populations. Helicobacter Pylori Infection Study Design: Population: The target population and the sampling method (e.g., random sampling from healthcare registries or population databases) Data Collection: Detail methods for identifying Helicobacter Pylori Infection cases (e.g., clinical examination, imaging studies) and demographic data (age, sex, ethnicity). Helicobacter Pylori Infection Epidemiological Parameters: Prevalence: Prevalence rates considered per 1,000 or 10,000 population. Incidence: Determine annual incidence rates per 1,000 person-years. Risk Factors: Analyse associations between Helicobacter Pylori Infection and potential risk factors (e.g., age, smoking, genetics). Geographical Variations: Compare prevalence or incidence rates across different regions or countries.                                            Helicobacter Pylori Infection study summary: Helicobacter Pylori Infection study summarizes the prevalence, incidence, possible risk factors, and geographic variations of the Helicobacter Pylori Infection worldwide. Helicobacter Pylori Infection Disease overview: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a type of bacteria that can infect the stomach lining. This infection may lead to inflammation (gastritis) or the development of ulcers in the stomach or the upper part of the small intestine (duodenum). In some individuals, especially if left untreated, H. pylori can increase the risk of developing stomach cancer. It is the most common human bacterial infection affecting 4.4 billion people, accounting about 50% of the world population. According to one of the study reported in AGA Journals, Global prevalence of Helicobacter Pylori Between 2015 and 2022, the estimated global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection was approximately 43.9% among adults and 35.1% among children and adolescents. Developing countries had prevalence rates in range of 80 to 95% and 30 to 50 % prevalence in developed countries. From 2015 to 2022, H. pylori infection rates varied across countries. Among adults, the lowest prevalence was observed in Finland (9.1%), New Zealand (9.2%), Croatia (13.3%), Indonesia (14.4%), and Hong Kong (15.0%), and the highest rates were reported in Jordan (88.6%), Guatemala (86.6%), Ecuador (85.7%), Nicaragua (83.3%), and Colombia (83.1%). In children and adolescents, the lowest infection rates were found in the Czech Republic (5.2%), South Korea (5.9%), the Netherlands (9.3%), Taiwan (11.0%), and Hong Kong (12.8%), furthermore, the highest rates in this age group ...

    Epidemiology Study - Table of Content

    TOC (TAB 1) Market Introduction

    • Disease Overview
    • Causes and Risk Factors
    • Disease Mortality Rate

    Market Scope

    • Qualitative Analysis
      • Drivers
      • Restraints
      • Diseases Analysis, By Age Group
    • Quantitative Analysis
      • Number of Patients (2019-2032)- By Region
        • Global
        • North America
        • Europe
        • Asia-Pacific
        • ROW
      • Incidence Rate- By Region
        • Global
        • North America
        • Europe
        • Asia-Pacific
        • ROW
      • Prevalence Rate- By Region
        • Global
        • North America
        • Europe
        • Asia-Pacific
        • ROW

    LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: GLOBAL NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 2: GLOBAL PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 3: GLOBAL INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 4: NORTH AMERICA NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 5: NORTH AMERICA PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 6: NORTH AMERICA INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 7: EUROPE NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 8: EUROPE PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 9: EUROPE INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 10: AISA-PACIFIC NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 11: AISA-PACIFIC PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 12: AISA-PACIFIC INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 13: ROW NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 14: ROW PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 15: ROW INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 LIST OF FIGURES FIG 1: GLOBAL NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 2: GLOBAL PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 3: GLOBAL INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 4: NORTH AMERICA NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 5: NORTH AMERICA PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 6: NORTH AMERICA INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 7: EUROPE NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 8: EUROPE PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 9: EUROPE INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 10: AISA-PACIFIC NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 11: AISA-PACIFIC PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 12: AISA-PACIFIC INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 13: ROW NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 14: ROW PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 15: ROW INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023  

    Pricing Analysis - Overview

    No reports available yet for Pricing Analysis. Select or create a report to view detailed overview.

    Pricing Analysis - Table of Content

    Table of contents for Pricing Analysis will appear here once a report is selected.

    Brand Share Analysis - Overview

    No reports available yet for Brand Share Analysis. Select or create a report to view detailed overview.

    Brand Share Analysis - Table of Content

    Table of contents for Brand Share Analysis will appear here once a report is selected.

    Regulatory Landscape - Overview

    Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests (IVD) Regulatory Landscape: Product Overview:

    Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a high throughput technology that allows for rapid sequencing of entire genomes, targeted regions or transcriptomes. In vitro diagnostics (IVDs) using NGS have transformed disease detection, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment selection, specially in oncology, infectious diseases and genetic disorder.

    Next Generation Sequencing based IVD Tests Types:

    Next generation sequencing based In vitro Diagnostics test include various types intended for diagnosis for various health conditions, some of which are as follows: Germline testing. Somatic mutation testing, liquid biopsy, infectious disease testing, prenatal testing, pharmacogenomics, rare disease diagnosis.

    Next Generation Sequencing based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests Applications:

    Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) tests is a transformative advancement in clinical diagnostics, offering advanced options for genetic analysis. These tests are capable of analysing millions of DNA sequences simultaneously, enabling the detection of a wide array of genetic variations in a single assay.

    One of the most impactful applications of NGS-based IVDs is in the diagnosis of inherited genetic disorders, where they allow for the simultaneous examination of multiple genes associated with complex conditions such as cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophies, and hereditary cancers.

     In oncology, NGS is used to profile tumors at the molecular level, identifying mutations that can guide personalized treatment strategies and predict therapeutic responses. Additionally, NGS plays a important role in infectious disease diagnostics by enabling the identification and characterization of pathogens, including their resistance profiles, which is essential for managing outbreaks and tailoring antimicrobial therapies.

    In prenatal and neonatal care, NGS-based tests are employed for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to detect chromosomal abnormalities and for newborn screening to identify rare genetic disorders early in life. Pharmacogenomics is another key area where NGS informs drug selection and dosing by analysing genetic factors that influence drug metabolism and response.

    Next Generation Sequencing based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests Regulatory Landscape:

    There are several key regulatory agencies who oversee the approval and monitoring of Next Generation Sequencing based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests to ensure their safety, efficacy, and quality.

    Regulatory agencies

    Regulatory Ministry

    Federal Food and Drug Administration

    United States: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

    The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

    United Kingdom: The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) under the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC)

    Central Drug Standard Control Organization

    India: The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA)

    National Department of Health.

    Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)

    Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.

    National Medical Products Administration (NMPA)

    China: The Ministry of Health

    Health Sciences Authority

    Singapore: The Ministry of Health

    European Medicine Agency

    European union

    Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa)

    Ministry of Health, part of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS)

     

    Next Generation Sequencing based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests Guidelines:

    These tests are designed for the diagnosis of suspected inherited (germline) or acquired (somatic) genetic disorders. They are also used in cancer diagnostics and screening, helping to identify patients suitable for targeted therapies (such as personalized medicine), guide treatment decisions (e.g., monitoring minimal residual disease or assessing relapse risk), and assist in disease staging.

    Next Generation Sequencing based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests Regulatory Process Overview, By Country:

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized two key guidance’s, aimed at accelerating the development of reliable next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests for genetic diseases and precision medicine. These guidelines provide a modern and flexible framework to support developers in creating and validating NGS-based in-vitro diagnostics (IVDs).

    1. Use of Public Human Genetic Variant Databases to Support Clinical Validity

    This guidance allows test developers to use clinical evidence from FDA-recognized public databases, such as ClinGen, to support clinical claims for their tests. By using these databases, developers can provide assurance of the accurate clinical evaluation of genomic test results, facilitating a more efficient path for marketing clearance or approval of new tests.

    1. Considerations for Design, Development, and Analytical Validation of NGS-Based IVDs for Germline Diseases

    The second guidance outlines recommendations for designing, developing, and validating NGS-based tests intended to aid in the diagnosis of suspected germline diseases. It provides insight into the FDA’s current thinking on what data is needed to determine the analytical validity of these tests, including how well the test detects the presence or absence of a particular genomic change.

    So far, the FDA has approved only a limited number of targeted, single-gene NGS-based tests for specific diseases, such as the Illumina MiSeqDx Cystic Fibrosis 139-Variant Assay (k124006) and the Illumina MiSeqDx Cystic Fibrosis Clinical Sequencing Assay (k132750). However, the FDA has not yet established a classification for NGS-based tests intended for broader use in diagnosing suspected germline conditions. Since there are no existing legally marketed devices of this type to serve as a predicate for a 510(k) submission under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)), these tests are automatically designated as Class III devices by law, so they undergo the more strict and extensive Premarket Approval (PMA) process.

    When no suitable predicate device exists, low- to moderate-risk devices, like certain NGS-based tests for diagnosing suspected germline diseases, may be eligible for the FDA’s De Novo classification process. The FDA believes the risks of these tests could be managed through general and special controls. If a De Novo request is approved, the test would be classified as a Class II device, allowing it to be marketed and used as a predicate for future 510(k) submissions. These future tests would then need to comply with the established general and special controls, such as performance standards and Labeling requirements. The FDA encourages developers to use the Pre-Submission process to consult with the Agency before submitting a De Novo request.

    Under section 510(m) of the FD&C Act, the FDA can exempt certain Class II devices from 510(k) premarket notification if it determines that such review isn’t necessary to ensure safety and effectiveness. As the FDA gains more experience with NGS-based tests for diagnosing suspected germline diseases, it may eventually establish special controls that would allow these tests to be exempt from 510(k) requirements under specific conditions.

    These guidelines are part of the FDA's efforts to streamline the regulation and review of NGS tests, promoting innovation while ensuring patient safety and test reliability.

    Analytical Performance of NGS Tests – FDA Perspective

    The FDA has approved the Illumina MiSeqDx system and its cystic fibrosis assays by evaluating a representative subset of genetic variants, rather than requiring data for every possible variant. This approach shows that adequate analytical performance for this subset can provide reasonable assurance and proving that test would identify relevant variants in the genome without need for the company to submit data for every possible variant the test could identify.  Going forward, the FDA plans to continue using this subset-based evaluation for NGS platforms. Additionally, the agency is exploring new, efficient methods for assessing analytical performance of lab-developed NGS tests that use FDA-cleared components.

    One proposed strategy is to develop methodological quality-based standards that labs can follow to demonstrate test performance. These standards could include:

    • Defined technical metrics (e.g., error rates, coverage, depth)
    • Computational methods for performance validation
    • Quality system requirements for labs
    • Best practices for quality assurance and proficiency testing
    • Change control processes to manage technology updates

    These standards can be developed by expert committees, the FDA, or organizations like the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI). If developed by a recognized Standards Development Organization (SDO), the FDA would review and recognise those standards using its already established Standards Programs.

    Clinical Performance Assessment of NGS Tests- FDA Perspective

    FDA evaluate the clinical performance of the NGS based IVD test based on a sponsor’s submission of adequate data or information submitted in premarket application for their device or device platform. This data can come from clinical studies, trusted databases, published research, or other solid scientific sources.

    When the FDA approved Illumina’s cystic fibrosis tests, they faced a challenge: some genetic variants are so rare that it’s hard to study them directly. Instead of requiring new studies, the FDA allowed the company to use a well-maintained third-party database that combined evidence from many sources to show which variants are linked to the disease.

    Now, the FDA is asking for public feedback on how this kind of approach (using trusted databases instead of new studies) could be used more widely to help doctors get accurate and timely genetic information for patient care.

    Next Generation Sequencing based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests updates:

    February 2025, Roche has introduced its breakthrough technology of Sequencing by Expansion (SBX), marking a significant improvement in next-generation sequencing (NGS). SBX uses a novel biochemical process which encode DNA or RNA sequences into measurable polymers called Xpandomers, which are 50 times longer than the original molecules. These Xpandomers produce high signal-to-noise outputs, enabling highly accurate single-molecule sequencing. The technology is integrated with a CMOS-based sensor module that supports parallel processing, allowing for ultra-rapid, scalable, and flexible sequencing. SBX reduces the time of genome sample processing, from days to just hours, still making it ideal for both research and clinical applications. It is especially promising for decoding complex diseases like cancer, immune disorders, and neurodegenerative conditions. Roche positions SBX as a transformative solution that overcomes the limitations of existing sequencing technologies by offering unmatched speed, accuracy, and adaptability.

    April 2025, Pillar Biosciences announced that its FDA-approved oncoReveal CDx pan-cancer solid tumor IVD kit has received nationwide Medicare coverage from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This next-generation sequencing (NGS) kit uses Pillar’s proprietary SLIMamp technology to detect genetic mutations—such as single nucleotide variants, insertions, and deletions—in 22 cancer-related genes from tumor tissue samples. It is designed to help healthcare professionals profile tumors in patients with solid cancers and guide treatment decisions.

    The kit is also approved as a companion diagnostic for identifying patients who may benefit from targeted therapies like EGFR TKIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ERBITUX or VECTIBIX in colorectal cancer (CRC). Cleared for use on the Illumina MiSeq Dx platform, the test is now more accessible and reimbursable, potentially improving outcomes by enabling faster, localized, and cost-effective genomic testing.

    Next Generation Sequencing based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests Regulatory Challenges and possible risk in development:

    All the countries have their own regulatory framework used for approval of healthcare products; this makes difficult for the manufacturers to develop the product which will show compliance to all the regulatory frameworks for different countries allowing its marketing in those countries. And NGS based IVD test are new advanced diagnostic technology for which regulatory bodies are still not clear about how to regulate them effectively.

    NGS based test may face technological challenges in development since it is a very complex technique, therefore its regulation will also be very strict, which can take longer time in its approval and may cause product launch delay, keeping patients away from getting such a advanced treatment.

    High cost in developing and validating the NGS based IVD test as it involves use of expensive equipment, bioinformatics infrastructure and skilled personnel for the research and development. There can be ethical issues as NGS based test involves sequencing of genome of the patient raising ethical concerns about disclosure of unexpected genetic information of patient.

    Next Generation Sequencing based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests Competitive Landscape Dashboard:

    Companies With Marketed Next Generation Sequencing based In Vitro Diagnostic Tests:

    • Thermo Fisher Scientific
    • Pacific Biosciences
    • QIAGEN
    • Roche
    • BGI Group
    • Illumina
    • Danaher Corporation
    • PerkinElmer
    • Agilent Technologies
    • Array Biologicals
    • Myraqa
    • Oxford Nanopore Technologies
    • Microsynth
    • Genesis HealthCare

    Regulatory Landscape - Table of Content

    Clinical Trial Analysis - Overview

    No reports available yet for Clinical Trial Analysis. Select or create a report to view detailed overview.

    Clinical Trial Analysis - Table of Content

    Table of contents for Clinical Trial Analysis will appear here once a report is selected.

    Customer Stories

    “Thanks. It’s been a pleasure working with you, please use me as reference with any other Intel employees.”

    Joseph Aguayo

    Director, Research Operations