mV
Microbiome Based Therapeutics Regulatory Landscape
ID: MRFR/60
200 Pages
June 2025
Epidemiology Study - Overview
Overview for Epidemiology Study (based on available reports).
Helicobacter Pylori Infection Study Objective: To determine the prevalence and incidence of Helicobacter Pylori Infection among individuals in a defined population. This objective outlines the primary aim of the study, which is to establish the frequency of Helicobacter Pylori Infection within a specific age group and geographic area, while also seeking to understand potential factors contributing to its development. Moreover, the report is having geographic coverage including North America, Europe and rest of the world however customisation can be made in the geographic coverage. Helicobacter Pylori Infection Study USP: This epidemiological study on Helicobacter Pylori Infection stands out due to its comprehensive approach in establishing precise prevalence rates, identifying novel risk factors, and exploring geographical variations in a diverse population. By integrating advanced imaging techniques with robust statistical analyses, the study aims to provide actionable insights to identify treatment opportunities, target population, and an overview on public health initiatives aimed at mitigating the impact of Helicobacter Pylori Infection related health problems. Through meticulous data collection and rigorous methodology, the study not only contributes to the scientific understanding of Helicobacter Pylori Infection but also serves as a foundation for future research events and healthcare policymaking in addressing this increasing Helicobacter Pylori Infection cases. Helicobacter Pylori Infection related Study Overview: The study Defines Helicobacter Pylori Infection as an advanced form of disease. The significance of studying Helicobacter Pylori Infection epidemiology is due to its increasing prevalence in different age populations. Helicobacter Pylori Infection Study Design: Population: The target population and the sampling method (e.g., random sampling from healthcare registries or population databases) Data Collection: Detail methods for identifying Helicobacter Pylori Infection cases (e.g., clinical examination, imaging studies) and demographic data (age, sex, ethnicity). Helicobacter Pylori Infection Epidemiological Parameters: Prevalence: Prevalence rates considered per 1,000 or 10,000 population. Incidence: Determine annual incidence rates per 1,000 person-years. Risk Factors: Analyse associations between Helicobacter Pylori Infection and potential risk factors (e.g., age, smoking, genetics). Geographical Variations: Compare prevalence or incidence rates across different regions or countries. Helicobacter Pylori Infection study summary: Helicobacter Pylori Infection study summarizes the prevalence, incidence, possible risk factors, and geographic variations of the Helicobacter Pylori Infection worldwide. Helicobacter Pylori Infection Disease overview: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a type of bacteria that can infect the stomach lining. This infection may lead to inflammation (gastritis) or the development of ulcers in the stomach or the upper part of the small intestine (duodenum). In some individuals, especially if left untreated, H. pylori can increase the risk of developing stomach cancer. It is the most common human bacterial infection affecting 4.4 billion people, accounting about 50% of the world population. According to one of the study reported in AGA Journals, Global prevalence of Helicobacter Pylori Between 2015 and 2022, the estimated global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection was approximately 43.9% among adults and 35.1% among children and adolescents. Developing countries had prevalence rates in range of 80 to 95% and 30 to 50 % prevalence in developed countries. From 2015 to 2022, H. pylori infection rates varied across countries. Among adults, the lowest prevalence was observed in Finland (9.1%), New Zealand (9.2%), Croatia (13.3%), Indonesia (14.4%), and Hong Kong (15.0%), and the highest rates were reported in Jordan (88.6%), Guatemala (86.6%), Ecuador (85.7%), Nicaragua (83.3%), and Colombia (83.1%). In children and adolescents, the lowest infection rates were found in the Czech Republic (5.2%), South Korea (5.9%), the Netherlands (9.3%), Taiwan (11.0%), and Hong Kong (12.8%), furthermore, the highest rates in this age group ...Epidemiology Study - Table of Content
TOC (TAB 1) Market Introduction
- Disease Overview
- Causes and Risk Factors
- Disease Mortality Rate
Market Scope
- Qualitative Analysis
- Drivers
- Restraints
- Diseases Analysis, By Age Group
- Quantitative Analysis
- Number of Patients (2019-2032)- By Region
- Global
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- ROW
- Incidence Rate- By Region
- Global
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- ROW
- Prevalence Rate- By Region
- Global
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- ROW
LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: GLOBAL NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 2: GLOBAL PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 3: GLOBAL INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 4: NORTH AMERICA NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 5: NORTH AMERICA PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 6: NORTH AMERICA INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 7: EUROPE NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 8: EUROPE PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 9: EUROPE INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 10: AISA-PACIFIC NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 11: AISA-PACIFIC PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 12: AISA-PACIFIC INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 13: ROW NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 14: ROW PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 15: ROW INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 LIST OF FIGURES FIG 1: GLOBAL NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 2: GLOBAL PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 3: GLOBAL INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 4: NORTH AMERICA NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 5: NORTH AMERICA PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 6: NORTH AMERICA INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 7: EUROPE NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 8: EUROPE PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 9: EUROPE INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 10: AISA-PACIFIC NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 11: AISA-PACIFIC PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 12: AISA-PACIFIC INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 13: ROW NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 14: ROW PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 15: ROW INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023
Pricing Analysis - Overview
No reports available yet for Pricing Analysis. Select or create a report to view detailed overview.
Pricing Analysis - Table of Content
Table of contents for Pricing Analysis will appear here once a report is selected.
Brand Share Analysis - Overview
No reports available yet for Brand Share Analysis. Select or create a report to view detailed overview.
Brand Share Analysis - Table of Content
Table of contents for Brand Share Analysis will appear here once a report is selected.
Regulatory Landscape - Overview
Microbiome based therapeutics Regulatory Landscape: Product Overview
Microbiome based therapeutics are developed with the intension to modulate the human microbiome to maintain and restore health. Traditional drugs usually target the pathogens or cells directly, but microbiome-based therapeutics aim to influence only microbial communities in the body primarily gut microbiome and skin, lungs and other mucosal sites.
Microbiome based therapeutics Applications:
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is a key application of microbiome-based therapeutics, where fecal matter from a healthy donor is introduced into a recipient’s gastrointestinal tract to restore microbial balance. This is most often accomplished using colonoscopies, enemas, or capsules, and is primarily used to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections, with growing potential in other microbiome-related disorders.
Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics are widely used to support gut health. Probiotics are live beneficial microbes that help balance the gut microbiota, while prebiotics are non-digestible fibers that feed these good bacteria. Synbiotics combine both to enhance their effects.
Next-generation probiotics (NGPs), such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Akkermansia muciniphila, offer targeted benefits like reducing inflammation with potential roles in managing chronic diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and metabolic disorders, NGP strains may influence the gut–brain axis, supporting mental health. Additionally, NGPs are being explored for personalized probiotic therapies, synthetic biology applications, and targeted delivery methods, showcasing their potential in precision medicine.
Microbial Metabolite-Based Therapies utilize small molecules produced by gut bacteria—such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids, and other signaling compounds—to influence host health. These metabolites play key roles in regulating immune responses, reducing inflammation, and supporting metabolic functions. For example, SCFAs like butyrate help strengthen the gut barrier and have anti-inflammatory effects. Such therapies are being explored for treating neurological, metabolic, and inflammatory bowel diseases, with ongoing research aimed at integrating them into clinical practice. Notably, butyrate enhances gut barrier integrity, modulates immune activity, and exhibits neuroprotective effects, making it a promising candidate for treating neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.
Microbiome based therapeutics Product Development steps:
Figure: Overview of FDA Product Development and Approval Process.
Microbiome based therapeutics Market Size Overview:
As per MRFR analysis, the Microbiome Therapeutic Market Size was estimated at 5.02 (USD Billion) in 2023. The Microbiome Therapeutic Market Industry is expected to grow from 5.41(USD Billion) in 2024 to 12.5 (USD Billion) by 2035. The Microbiome Therapeutic Market CAGR (growth rate) is expected to be around 7.91% during the forecast period (2025 - 2035).
Microbiome based therapeutics Regulatory Landscape:
There are several key regulatory agencies who oversee the approval and monitoring of Microbiome based therapeutics to ensure their safety, efficacy, and quality.
Regulatory agencies |
Regulatory Ministry |
Federal Food and Drug Administration |
United States: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency |
United Kingdom: The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) under the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) |
Central Drug Standard Control Organization |
India: The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare |
South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) |
National Department of Health. |
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) |
Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. |
National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) |
China: The Ministry of Health |
Health Sciences Authority |
Singapore: The Ministry of Health |
European Medicine Agency |
European union |
Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) |
Ministry of Health, part of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS) |
Microbiome based therapeutics Guidelines:
Microbiome based therapies are given to individuals with medical conditions linked to gut dysbiosis or an imbalance in the body’s microbial community, which aim to restore the healthy microbiota composition and function, for instance, it is administered to patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) or individuals with inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) or to patients suffering with metabolic disorders.
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is considered an investigational treatment by the FDA, primarily used for patients with recurrent C. difficile infections, and for its administration patients informed consent is required. FMT is typically safe, but the method of delivery, often through endoscopy, can cause short-term side effects like bloating, gas, constipation, or mild diarrhea, which are usually temporary and resolved on their own.
Microbiome based therapeutics Classification of the Product:
Microbiome based therapeutics Regulatory Process Overview, By Country:
The regulatory aspects of microbiome-based therapies are complex and evolving. As these therapies represent a relatively new field, regulatory frameworks are still being developed and refined.
The regulatory pathway for microbiome-based therapeutics involves several structured steps to ensure safety, efficacy, and quality. Here are some key regulatory considerations for microbiome-based therapies:
Classification of the product: First, the product must be classified appropriately—either as a drug, biologic, medical device, or combination product—based on its composition and mechanism of action. This classification determines the regulatory framework it will follow. In some cases, such as Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT), regulatory agencies like the U.S. FDA may exercise enforcement discretion, allowing limited use without full approval under specific conditions.
Safety and risk assessment: Once classified, the product must undergo rigorous clinical trials, starting with preclinical studies and progressing through Phase I (safety), Phase II (efficacy and dosing), Phase III (confirmation of efficacy and monitoring of adverse effects), and Phase IV (post-marketing surveillance). Throughout this process, developers must conduct thorough risk assessments, particularly for live microbial products, to evaluate potential infection risks and immune responses.
Manufacturing and quality control: Manufacturing must comply with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) to ensure consistency, purity, and potency of the product. These steps collectively form the regulatory backbone for bringing microbiome-based therapies to market. Product Development should follow standardized protocols for collection, processing, and storage of microbiome samples for ensuring product consistency and safety.
Regulatory submissions required by FDA during therapeutic approval process include:
- Investigational New Drug (IND) Applications are required for most microbiome-based therapies before starting clinical trials. IND application should include treatment protocol including an informed consent of the participants involved in clinical trials. The FDA reviews preclinical data, manufacturing details, and clinical plans to ensure participant safety.
- If the therapy is classified as a biological product, a Biologics License Application (BLA) must be submitted for FDA approval, including detailed data on safety, effectiveness, and production methods.
- For Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) used to treat Clostridium difficile infections unresponsive to standard treatments, the FDA currently allows its use under enforcement discretion, meaning full regulatory approval is not required in these specific cases.
- However, for other uses of FMT, an IND application is still necessary to proceed with clinical research.
EMA Regulatory Requirements for approval of Microbiome based Therapeutics include as follows:
Microbiome-based therapies are classified as Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs), which even comprise gene therapy, somatic cell therapy, and tissue-engineered products. These therapies are complex in nature and therefore they follow special regulatory pathways.
Clinical trials in the EU, companies must obtain a Clinical Trial Authorization (CTA), similar to the FDA’s IND, which involves a detailed review of preclinical data, clinical plans, and manufacturing processes.
International Collaboration: The FDA and EMA also work together through international collaborations to align regulatory standards. Organizations like the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) help create shared guidelines to support global development of microbiome-based therapies.
Microbiome based therapeutics updates:
May 2023, The U.S. FDA has approved Vowst (formerly SER-109), developed by Seres Therapeutics and Nestlé, as the second microbiome-based therapy for preventing recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) after antibiotic treatment. Vowst is an oral capsule containing spore-forming Firmicute bacteria purified from healthy donors. It follows the approval of Rebyota, a rectally administered microbiota-based product by Ferring/Rebiotix. CDI is a serious healthcare-associated infection causing up to 30,000 deaths annually in the U.S. Traditional antibiotics often fail to prevent recurrence, as they disrupt both harmful and beneficial gut bacteria. Microbiome-based therapies like Vowst aim to restore healthy gut flora to prevent reinfection.
In the ECOSPOR III Phase III trial, 88% of Vowst recipients had a sustained clinical response at 8 weeks, compared to 60% in the placebo group. The ECOSPOR IV trial, an open-label study with 263 patients, further supported its safety and efficacy. Common side effects included bloating, fatigue, constipation, chills, and diarrhea. Vowst was approved under Priority Review, Orphan and Breakthrough Therapy Designation.
November 2022, two microbiome-based therapies, BIOMICTRA by BiomeBank and REBYOTA by Ferring Pharmaceuticals, were approved for treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, a condition marked by severe diarrhea and significant unmet medical need. BIOMICTRA is a whole microbiota transplant, while REBYOTA is a live biotherapeutic, reflecting the diversity in current microbiome drug approaches.
In 2022, there were 288 new live biotherapeutic assets and 199 whole ecosystem-derived products announced, 526 clinical trials were identified in the microbiome therapeutics field, as of February 2023, showing a 25% average annual growth rate since 2012.
Microbiome based therapeutics Regulatory Challenges and possible risk in development:
The development of microbiome-based therapeutics faces several clinical and manufacturing challenges. During Clinical trials, Patient selection is complex, particularly in advanced trial phases, and designing effective, standardized trials remains difficult.
Regulatory uncertainty makes approval of these therapeutics furthermore challenging. Many companies depend on external experts, raising concerns about the need for internal capabilities to ensure long-term success.
Additionally, planning for scale-up during development is still an evolving process. On the manufacturing side, ensuring product stability and self-life for live biotherapeutic products is a major hurdle.
Regulatory frameworks are still evolving, with agencies like the FDA refining their guidance, and the lack of industry benchmarks makes it difficult for companies to navigate development confidently.
Microbiome based therapeutics Competitive Landscape Dashboard:
Companies With Marketed Microbiome based therapeutics:
- Synlogic
- Amgen
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
- Mikrobio
- Havencrest Capital
- Medosome Biotec
- Zymeworks
- 2seventy bio
- AOBiome
- Eden Biosciences
- AbbVie
- Diverse Biotech
- Microbiotica
- Enterome
- Seres Therapeutics
Regulatory Landscape - Table of Content
Clinical Trial Analysis - Overview
No reports available yet for Clinical Trial Analysis. Select or create a report to view detailed overview.
Clinical Trial Analysis - Table of Content
Table of contents for Clinical Trial Analysis will appear here once a report is selected.
Customer Stories
“Thanks. It’s been a pleasure working with you, please use me as reference with any other Intel employees.”