×

This is a sample popup content.

  • Cat-intel
  • MedIntelliX
  • Resources
  • About Us
  • M Health Regulatory Landscape

    ID: MRFR/36
    200 Pages
    MRFR Team
    April 2025
    $ 4950
    $ 5950
    $ 7950

    Epidemiology Study - Overview

    Overview for Epidemiology Study (based on available reports).

    Helicobacter Pylori Infection Study Objective: To determine the prevalence and incidence of Helicobacter Pylori Infection among individuals in a defined population. This objective outlines the primary aim of the study, which is to establish the frequency of Helicobacter Pylori Infection within a specific age group and geographic area, while also seeking to understand potential factors contributing to its development. Moreover, the report is having geographic coverage including North America, Europe and rest of the world however customisation can be made in the geographic coverage. Helicobacter Pylori Infection Study USP: This epidemiological study on Helicobacter Pylori Infection stands out due to its comprehensive approach in establishing precise prevalence rates, identifying novel risk factors, and exploring geographical variations in a diverse population. By integrating advanced imaging techniques with robust statistical analyses, the study aims to provide actionable insights to identify treatment opportunities, target population, and an overview on public health initiatives aimed at mitigating the impact of Helicobacter Pylori Infection related health problems. Through meticulous data collection and rigorous methodology, the study not only contributes to the scientific understanding of Helicobacter Pylori Infection but also serves as a foundation for future research events and healthcare policymaking in addressing this increasing Helicobacter Pylori Infection cases. Helicobacter Pylori Infection related Study Overview: The study Defines Helicobacter Pylori Infection as an advanced form of disease. The significance of studying Helicobacter Pylori Infection epidemiology is due to its increasing prevalence in different age populations. Helicobacter Pylori Infection Study Design: Population: The target population and the sampling method (e.g., random sampling from healthcare registries or population databases) Data Collection: Detail methods for identifying Helicobacter Pylori Infection cases (e.g., clinical examination, imaging studies) and demographic data (age, sex, ethnicity). Helicobacter Pylori Infection Epidemiological Parameters: Prevalence: Prevalence rates considered per 1,000 or 10,000 population. Incidence: Determine annual incidence rates per 1,000 person-years. Risk Factors: Analyse associations between Helicobacter Pylori Infection and potential risk factors (e.g., age, smoking, genetics). Geographical Variations: Compare prevalence or incidence rates across different regions or countries.                                            Helicobacter Pylori Infection study summary: Helicobacter Pylori Infection study summarizes the prevalence, incidence, possible risk factors, and geographic variations of the Helicobacter Pylori Infection worldwide. Helicobacter Pylori Infection Disease overview: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a type of bacteria that can infect the stomach lining. This infection may lead to inflammation (gastritis) or the development of ulcers in the stomach or the upper part of the small intestine (duodenum). In some individuals, especially if left untreated, H. pylori can increase the risk of developing stomach cancer. It is the most common human bacterial infection affecting 4.4 billion people, accounting about 50% of the world population. According to one of the study reported in AGA Journals, Global prevalence of Helicobacter Pylori Between 2015 and 2022, the estimated global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection was approximately 43.9% among adults and 35.1% among children and adolescents. Developing countries had prevalence rates in range of 80 to 95% and 30 to 50 % prevalence in developed countries. From 2015 to 2022, H. pylori infection rates varied across countries. Among adults, the lowest prevalence was observed in Finland (9.1%), New Zealand (9.2%), Croatia (13.3%), Indonesia (14.4%), and Hong Kong (15.0%), and the highest rates were reported in Jordan (88.6%), Guatemala (86.6%), Ecuador (85.7%), Nicaragua (83.3%), and Colombia (83.1%). In children and adolescents, the lowest infection rates were found in the Czech Republic (5.2%), South Korea (5.9%), the Netherlands (9.3%), Taiwan (11.0%), and Hong Kong (12.8%), furthermore, the highest rates in this age group ...

    Epidemiology Study - Table of Content

    TOC (TAB 1) Market Introduction

    • Disease Overview
    • Causes and Risk Factors
    • Disease Mortality Rate

    Market Scope

    • Qualitative Analysis
      • Drivers
      • Restraints
      • Diseases Analysis, By Age Group
    • Quantitative Analysis
      • Number of Patients (2019-2032)- By Region
        • Global
        • North America
        • Europe
        • Asia-Pacific
        • ROW
      • Incidence Rate- By Region
        • Global
        • North America
        • Europe
        • Asia-Pacific
        • ROW
      • Prevalence Rate- By Region
        • Global
        • North America
        • Europe
        • Asia-Pacific
        • ROW

    LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: GLOBAL NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 2: GLOBAL PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 3: GLOBAL INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 4: NORTH AMERICA NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 5: NORTH AMERICA PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 6: NORTH AMERICA INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 7: EUROPE NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 8: EUROPE PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 9: EUROPE INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 10: AISA-PACIFIC NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 11: AISA-PACIFIC PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 12: AISA-PACIFIC INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 13: ROW NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 TABLE 14: ROW PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 TABLE 15: ROW INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 LIST OF FIGURES FIG 1: GLOBAL NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 2: GLOBAL PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 3: GLOBAL INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 4: NORTH AMERICA NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 5: NORTH AMERICA PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 6: NORTH AMERICA INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 7: EUROPE NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 8: EUROPE PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 9: EUROPE INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 10: AISA-PACIFIC NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 11: AISA-PACIFIC PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 12: AISA-PACIFIC INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 13: ROW NUMBER OF PATIENTS FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2032 FIG 14: ROW PREVALENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023 FIG 15: ROW INCIDENCE RATE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION FROM 2019-2023  

    Pricing Analysis - Overview

    No reports available yet for Pricing Analysis. Select or create a report to view detailed overview.

    Pricing Analysis - Table of Content

    Table of contents for Pricing Analysis will appear here once a report is selected.

    Brand Share Analysis - Overview

    No reports available yet for Brand Share Analysis. Select or create a report to view detailed overview.

    Brand Share Analysis - Table of Content

    Table of contents for Brand Share Analysis will appear here once a report is selected.

    Regulatory Landscape - Overview

    mHealth Regulatory Landscape: Product Overview

    mHealth is an abbreviated version of mobile health technology, it basically mobile and wireless technology utilised in medical care, it involves medical and public health practice and make use of mobile devices, like mobile phones, patient monitoring devices, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and other wireless devices. It helps in surveillance of disease, treatment of various disease, epidemic outbreak tracking and chronic disease management.

    mHealth Types

    mHealth devices are broadly divided into following categories:

    Remote monitoring apps: they help the healthcare practitioners to monitor patients’ health status even when they are at home, like monitoring blood glucose levels, oxygen level, heart rate, blood pressure, without visiting the patient.

    Clinical and diagnostic apps: This app is involved in gathering, evaluating, and sharing data of patients, including the ability to access electronic health records (EHRs), review lab results, and even help in performing digital imaging. They have Built-in symptom identifiers helping the healthcare practitioners and patients to diagnose quickly any health issues or injuries. They are even useful for hassle-free patient scheduling.

    Clinical reference apps: With these apps, there is no need of searching for references and guides. All the information required is provided at the fingertips. It provides digital access to E&M coding, ICD-9 and ICD-10, and other essential reference documents.

    Healthy living apps: they are designed for helping to maintain and monitor the health every day for patients, mostly involved in monitoring health factors like heart rate, diet, exercise, and sleep. They are beneficial for the diabetes and heart patients.

    Productivity apps: They increase the efficiency within the healthcare providers, designed for mobile charting, scheduling home healthcare, internal business communication, and remote dictation. The app provides all the necessary functions and even maintain the compliance Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) HIPAA.

    mHealth Applications

    Applications where mHealth is involved includes monitoring diabetes, monitoring rate of heartbeats through wrist watches, drug adherence ingestible sensors and apps providing health advice after mentioning the physical or psychological symptoms- telemedicine. Furthermore, there are step counting, calorie intake counting and personal fitness training technology apps available helping to maintain health every day.

    Mhealth trends

    In November 2023, AstraZeneca has launched Evinova, a new health-tech business aimed at accelerating innovation in the life sciences sector. Evinova will focus on digital health solutions, including remote patient monitoring and digital therapeutics, and has partnered with clinical research organizations like Parexel and Fortrea. The goal is to optimize clinical trial design and delivery, reducing development time and costs. Evinova's technologies have already been used successfully in over 40 countries and is available in 80 languages.

    June 2024, Ryde Group Ltd has partnered with Mobile-health Network Solutions (MaNaDr) to enhance telehealth and quick commerce services. This collaboration aims to improve the well-being of Ryde's driver-partners and their families by providing affordable healthcare access through MaNaDr's 24/7 telemedicine platform. The partnership will benefits includes, access to members rate telemedicine consultations, joint marketing campaigns to increase brand awareness and provide convenient healthcare solutions.

    mHealth Product Development Steps:

    Centre for device and radiological health (CDRH) is responsible for the regulation of medical devices including mHealth software functions, office of product evaluation (OPEQ) conducts the review and evaluation of all the medical devices for ensuring its safety and efficacy under Food and drug administration (FDA).

                       mHealth Product Development

                             Fig: overview of product development and approval process

    mHealth Market Size Overview:

    As per MRFR analysis, the mHealth Market Size was estimated at 60.43 (USD Billion) in 2022. The mHealth Market Industry is expected to grow from 66.18 (USD Billion) in 2023 to 150.0 (USD Billion) by 2032. The mHealth Market CAGR (growth rate) is expected to be around 9.52% during the forecast period (2024 - 2032).

                         mHealth Market Size Overview               

                 Source: Primary Research, Secondary Research, MRFR Database and Analyst Review

    mHealth Regulatory Landscape:

    There are several key regulatory agencies who oversee the approval and monitoring of mHealth to ensure their safety, efficacy, and quality.

    Regulatory agencies Regulatory Ministry
    Federal Food and Drug Administration United States: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
    The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency United Kingdom: The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) under the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC)
    Central Drug Standard Control Organization India: The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
    South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) National Department of Health.
    Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
    National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) China: The Ministry of Health
    Health Sciences Authority Singapore: The Ministry of Health
    European Medicine Agency European union
    Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) Ministry of Health, part of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS)

     

    mHealth Guidelines:

    Eligibility for using mhealth medical service depends on type of health problem patient is facing, and local regulations. Generally, it is used for tracking the blood glucose levels by the diabetic patients, for remote monitoring of patient health by the healthcare providers in case the patients are not able to visit hospital regularly, for monitoring the heart rate for the cardiovascular disease patients, or those who want to take care of the general health conditions and wants to track their everyday steps, calorie intake, calories lost.

    mHealth Classification of the Product:

    mHealth egulatory Process Overview, By Country:

    Mobile medical applications are often referred as software functions, which are software programs running on mobiles with intension to perform medical function, which range from aiding in disease diagnosis to monitoring patient health data. US FDA regulates these software functions for ensuring its quality, safety and efficacy.

    Regulatory steps of these software functions are as follows

    Determination of device classification

    All medical devices are classified into three classes by FDA, including class I, class II, class III, first step is to assess whether software function meets the definition of medical device under 201(h) of federal food, drug, and cosmetic act (FD&CA).

    Device is classified based on the risk it can pose to the patients  

    Class I – devices with low risk to patients and need to submit only general controls in approval process, and General Controls includes, registration, and Medical Device listing (21 CFR Part 807); Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), Labeling Requirements (21 CFR Part 801), Medical Device Reporting (21 CFR Part 803), Premarket Notification (21 CFR Part 807), Reporting Corrections and Removals (21 CFR Part 806); and Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) requirements for clinical studies of investigational devices (21 CFR Part 812).

    Class II- devices with moderate risk to patients and needs to submit General Controls (as described for Class I), Special Controls, and (for most Class II devices) Premarket Notification.

    Class III- devices with high risk to the patients, usually include the devices which are life sustaining and need to submit General Controls (as described for Class I), and Premarket Approval (21 CFR Part 814). For getting grant of approval.

    If a product is considered a medical device, the manufacturer must comply with certain FDA regulatory requirements. These requirements include

    Establishment registrations and medical device listing

    Manufacturers and distributors need to do establishment registration with the FDA, and electronic submission of all establishments is required, unless FDA has granted waiver, mostly they have to pay establishment registration fee to FDA. Devices must be listed with the FDA under appropriate category.

    Submissions required

    Premarket notification (510(K))- submit evidence indicating the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed device. Mostly required for class II devices.

    Premarket Approval (PMA) – mostly required for Class III devices, involves strict scientific and regulatory review for ensuring safety and effectiveness, it requires clinical data and detailed manufacturing information.

    Medical device manufacturers should identify the current classification covering their device.

    Manufacturers are required to prepare and submit to FDA an appropriate premarket

    submission, as required for their device classification.

     

    Investigational device exemption (IDE) for clinical studies: clinical studies should be conducted in by following IDE requirements (21 CFR 812) which ensure that are credible, accurate, and ethically collected clinical data. According to IDE it allows an investigational device use in clinical study, for collecting safety and effectiveness data needed to support marketing submission like Premarket Approval (PMA), Premarket Notification (510(k)), De Novo, Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE)) to FDA. If there is a significant risk with devices to be used in clinical study, it must be first approved by FDA and Institutional Review Board67 (IRB) before the study Starts, and devices with non-significant risk need approval of only IRB before start of the study.

     Medical device manufacturers who intend to conduct research involving human subjects are

    encouraged to engage with FDA through the Q-submission Program to receive feedback on

    testing and development activities.

     

    Quality system regulation – manufacturers need to ensure compliance with QS regulation, which gives framework to all manufacturers for developing products which will fulfil applicable requirements and specifications.

    Labelling requirements- manufacturers of medical devices needs to comply with the requirements of labeling 21 CFR Part 801 for medical devices and 21 CFR Part 809 for in vitro diagnostic products.

     

    Medical Device Reporting (MDR) (Adverse event reporting)

    It must be submitted by manufacturer and importers to FDA if they become aware or find and issue with the approved and marketed device like contributed to death or injury to patient or malfunction.

    According to guidelines for MDR, Medical device manufacturers must submit following to FDA:

    • Report MDR events as per 21 CFR 803.10(c) and 803.50.
    • Submit 5-day reports (21 CFR 803.53).
    • Provide supplemental reports (21 CFR 803.56).
    • Develop and maintain procedures to identify and evaluate MDR events (21 CFR 803.17).
    • Investigate and determine the cause of each event (21 CFR 803.50(b)(3)).
    • Keep complete files of all complaints about adverse events (21 CFR 803.18).

    This ensures safety and efficacy of medical devices by monitoring and reporting the issues.

     

    HIPPA - The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)

    the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in United States law, is involved in establishing national privacy standards for protecting patients’ medical records and health information, which is shared with healthcare professionals, medical offices, hospitals. HIPAA protect patient privacy, ensure data security, and regulate the use of patient’s sensitive health information.

    mHealth News:

    April 2021, The New platform called the Remote Diagnostics and Management Platform (RDMP) is launched by Mayo Clinic, for enhancing the analysis of data from mobile health (mHealth) devices. There is a integration of health data of patient with advanced artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to support clinical decision-making and provide continuous care. RDMP aims to deliver event-driven medicine. The platform will help clinicians to do fast and accurate diagnoses, allowing patients to take more care of their health.

    mHealth Regulatory Challenges:

    Compliance with Regulations: one of the biggest challenge for mHealth products is compliance with various regulations such as HIPAA in the US, and other local healthcare regulations, which makes process of ensuring compliance, complex and time-consuming.

    Data Security and Privacy: Protecting patient data is important, manufacturers of mhealth products should develop security measures for protecting sensitive health information, which can be challenging, due to the increasing sophistication of cyber threats.

    Approval Processes: FDA approval grant can be a lengthy and very strict process, which can delay the product launch in market for mHealth products.

    Possible Risk in development of mHealth: 

    Technical Risks: Developing mHealth apps involves integrating various technologies such as IoT devices, cloud computing, and AI. Ensuring seamless integration and functionality can be risky and challenging.

    User Adoption: Even if the app is technologically perfect, risk of users adoption of particular product is always present(both patients and healthcare providers), adoptability issues can be due to usability issues, lack of awareness, or resistance to change.

    Financial Risks: Product development and manufacturing cost of mHealth products is very high and not necessary that the investment will give back expected results, if the app fails to gain traction in the market.

    mHealth Competitive Landscape Dashboard:

    Companies With Marketed mHealth Products

    • Apple
    • Fitbit
    • UnitedHealth Group
    • Google
    • Qualcomm
    • Philips
    • HealthTap
    • McKesson Corporation
    • Johns Hopkins University
    • Cerner Corporation
    • IBM
    • Samsung Electronics
    • Medtronic
    • Deloitte

    Regulatory Landscape - Table of Content

    Clinical Trial Analysis - Overview

    No reports available yet for Clinical Trial Analysis. Select or create a report to view detailed overview.

    Clinical Trial Analysis - Table of Content

    Table of contents for Clinical Trial Analysis will appear here once a report is selected.

    Customer Stories

    “Thanks. It’s been a pleasure working with you, please use me as reference with any other Intel employees.”

    Joseph Aguayo

    Director, Research Operations